<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bill Aims to Clarify Rules on Tip Pooling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ddifo.org/bill-aims-to-clarify-rules-on-tip-pooling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ddifo.org/bill-aims-to-clarify-rules-on-tip-pooling/</link>
	<description>Dunkin Donuts Independent Franchise Owners</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 20:00:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top Stories of 2009 at DDIFO.org : Dunkin Donuts Independent Franchise Owners</title>
		<link>http://www.ddifo.org/bill-aims-to-clarify-rules-on-tip-pooling/comment-page-1/#comment-2585</link>
		<dc:creator>Top Stories of 2009 at DDIFO.org : Dunkin Donuts Independent Franchise Owners</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 19:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ddifo.org/?p=2952#comment-2585</guid>
		<description>[...] 8. Starbucks wins California Tip-pooling Case Appeal An appeals court in California sided with Starbucks Corp. and on Tuesday reversed a lower-court ruling that the Seattle coffee giant’s tip-sharing policies violated California labor law. The court agreed with Starbucks that shift supervisors may share in customers’ tips. A class-action lawsuit brought by Jou Chau, a former barista for Starbucks (NASDAQ: SBUX), alleged that the coffee chain’s policy allowing shift supervisors to share in tip money that customers place in jars violated California labor laws. A San Diego lower court sided with Chau in the suit and awarded more than $86 million in damages but on Tuesday, that ruling was overturned. See Also: Rewarding Exceptional Service is Upheld in California and Bill Aims to Clarify Rules on Tip Pooling [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 8. Starbucks wins California Tip-pooling Case Appeal An appeals court in California sided with Starbucks Corp. and on Tuesday reversed a lower-court ruling that the Seattle coffee giant’s tip-sharing policies violated California labor law. The court agreed with Starbucks that shift supervisors may share in customers’ tips. A class-action lawsuit brought by Jou Chau, a former barista for Starbucks (NASDAQ: SBUX), alleged that the coffee chain’s policy allowing shift supervisors to share in tip money that customers place in jars violated California labor laws. A San Diego lower court sided with Chau in the suit and awarded more than $86 million in damages but on Tuesday, that ruling was overturned. See Also: Rewarding Exceptional Service is Upheld in California and Bill Aims to Clarify Rules on Tip Pooling [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
